Thursday, August 29, 2013
Optional ACT and SAT?
Our discussion in class regarding the ACT and SAT got me thinking about why we have these tests and what would happen if we didn't put so much pressure on students to take them. I personally do not believe a score on one of these tests is a true representation of your intelligence or that a high score should be the main thing colleges look for when they are deciding who to accept. Supporters of the tests might say that the ACT and SAT are two very different tests so students can have multiple chances to receive a high score, but I see this as a huge problem. There are not just two different learning categories that students can fit under in the world. Every person is different and we all have different learning styles, approaches and ways of thinking. Also, students who come from wealthier families and schools have more access to resources needed to get a high score. Taking a test itself costs money, but if you want to retake the test to do better, buy a practice book, or take a class, the money starts to add up. The focus for getting into college is spending more time, energy, and money on getting higher scores as opposed to personalizing applications and writing essays. Many colleges do look at recommendation letters, activities, GPA, essays, and interviews, but what if all colleges didn't require test scores at all? I found an article that was written this month about colleges who aren't requiring test scores in their application. The article (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roger-ochoa/applying-to-college-no-sa_b_3701210.html) quotes the New York times saying "test anxiety is a real phenomenon and that those tense hours in a stale-aired gymnasium aren't reflective of a person's work ethic or aptitude." I strongly agree with the author of the article and continued reading about something I had not thought of before. If every school were to make SAT and ACT test scores optional on the application, the application process would be extremely difficult. The administration office would need to learn more about the students though essays, interviews, letters, GPA, and activities. This would take many more hours and make colleges more competitive than they already are. I'm not sure what the perfect solution is to this testing problem, but we need to think of a way to take away the pressure, lower costs, personalize the applications, and keep the process moving quickly.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with what you wrote here Lindsay! It's completely ridiculous to put so much importance on a standardized test. However, where you said "students who come from wealthier families and schools have more access to resources needed to get a high score", I'm not so sure I completely agree. In my opinion, you can get books to practice, and you can take courses to learn about the types of questions you'll be asked on these tests, but even after all this effort into preparing for this intimidating test, you still might not do that well. This is because it's a standardized test - either you're good at understanding how the tests asks the questions, or you're not.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more. I always wondered this in high school because I never did as well on my ACT and SAT as other people, but I knew I was a good student. These tests don't seem to test you on the lessons that we have learned in school. What exactly are they testing us on and how do these tests determine our college readiness. It's also easier for students from higher SES to succeed because they have the resources to prepare them. I do not understand the point of all of this standardized testing.
ReplyDelete