In class we have been
discussing standardized testing and recently the topic of gifted and talented
students came up. Too many schools rely solely on test results to identify
these students. I found an article written by Robert J. Sternberg (http://trib.com/opinion/columns/diverse-ways-of-identifying-gifted-students/article_c129d14c-a949-5ab4-bfe2-6b8af6661e7b.html)
that argues against this procedure. I agree that talent comes in so many diverse
ways; analytically, creatively, practically, ethically, etc. A single
standardized test result cannot show anywhere near close to the full range of
skills a child is capable of possessing in the classroom or outside of it. I
also believe there is too much error in testing, especially for kids. The
younger a child is, the less experience they have with test taking and dealing
with the anxiety that comes with it. This means the judgments made from test
scores become less reliable as we test younger and younger students. I also don’t
think it makes sense for a child to be assessed once a year or less to
determine if they are gifted. Children are dynamic in their development and
excel at different rates; some early then not at all and some late and continue
on. We must find broader models to identify students as gifted or talented. We need to look at “multiple intelligences”
and this includes: “linguistic, logical-mathematical,
spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, naturalist, interpersonal, and
intrapersonal”. We should also pay attention to above-average ability,
creativity, and motivation.
I really liked this article and I agree with a lot of it. I know that when I was in third grade I was classified as gifted & talented and had to go to a different school one day every week. There were about three people from every school that went and there were about 30 total kids in each grade. When I went to this school every day I felt like everybody else was smarter than me and that's because I had excelled in social things, what most people would call "street smarts" and that is one of the reasons I was there. Although, I did excel in mathematics and science I still felt below the other students. That's where I think this article fell short, not only are kids considered gifted based on testing but it was also what our teachers saw in us. I think that this article was too general in it's findings.
ReplyDelete